I got this question from a reader and wanted your opinions:

I have both a mortgage on our house, and a home equity line of credit. The mortgage rate is fixed (4.4.%) for 15 years. The home equity is variable, right now, it is only 2.24%. I am trying to accelerate payments beyond the minimum to get out of debt more quickly.

  1. When the home equity rate is higher than the mortgage rate, it is a no-brainer - pay the minimum on the mortgage and throw any extra money into the home equity loan.

  2. However, when the home equity loan is lower, like now, it is a little more tricky. It may seem obvious to pay the minimum on the home equity and pay off more of the higher interest mortgage. That would be the clear choice, if I could count on not needing to tap the home equity line down the road. But, what if I anticipate some large expenses down the road, for which I would need to borrow? If my home equity is close to the ceiling, then I won't be able to borrow against it when I need it. No matter how much I've paid off my mortgage, I can't get more from that source if I need it. So, what's the best strategy in this situation? (And, you can ignore the issue that as the home equity gets closer to the ceiling, that hurts my credit rating a little. For the current purposes, I don't anticipate taking out any other loans, and I pay my credit cards off each month.)

asked Feb 22 at 02:07

Daniel's gravatar image

Daniel
3958

Great question!

(Feb 22 at 03:47) mbhunter ♦♦

4 Answers:

Your reader see a couple of the main issues already:

  1. Paying high-interest debt first vs. low-interest debt is desirable, all other things being equal
  2. Accelerated mortgage debt payments reduce savings (once they go toward the mortgage, they can't be taken out)
  3. The interest rate on the HELOC is variable

The reader's primary concern beyond this appears to be having enough funds available for big expenses. Let's take the mortgage out of the equation, since it's fixed, and likely will still be around when the big expenses hit. That leaves how to handle the HELOC. For this, there are a couple of ways to handle this:

  1. Pay down the HELOC at a faster rate down to a level that will allow borrowing for the expense, and then pay the minimum on the HELOC, putting the difference in savings.
  2. Pay only the minimum on the HELOC and save the difference in a savings account to build up cash reserves for the expense. (Basically don't accelerate the payments at all)
  3. Pay off the HELOC ASAP so the debt goes away, and then save for the expense. (Accelerate the payments to get rid of it.)

These all will move toward the goal of having the big-expense funds available when they're needed. Some variables that could derail any of these, though:

  1. The HELOC rate could rise. 2.24% is very low. Is it a teaser rate? In any case, it doesn't have much room to go down.
  2. The HELOC limit could be reduced by the bank. Depending on any number of things, and whether the terms of the HELOC allow it, the bank may be able to reduce the limit on the HELOC, so any borrowing cushion could evaporate.
  3. Unexpected expenses like job loss, illness, etc. But these can derail anything.

If I were in your reader's shoes, I'd place priority on building up cash reserves to a comfortable level, then paying down the HELOC, then the mortgage. Cash in the bank buys time. The HELOC isn't as secure as money in the bank. For sure, this is a more costly way of doing it in the long run, since there's more interest paid on the HELOC, a low HELOC balance will do no good in the event of job loss, and the bank could well reduce the limit before then (or perhaps because of the job loss). I'd also encourage your reader to check out the terms of the HELOC to see whether my concerns are actually issues or not.

answered Feb 22 at 04:56

mbhunter's gravatar image

mbhunter ♦♦
27341212

I agree that right now he could be "earning" 4.4% by making payments on the mortgage, he could "earn" more by waiting and paying off the HELOC, which may reach 4.4% in the next year and could very well reach a much higher rate.

By putting money into a savings account earning 1-2%, he would be losing 2-3% in the short term, but could gain it back in the long term.

See my answer below

(Feb 22 at 20:47) Daniel

MBH, as usual lays things out-very accurately.

I would just add a few minor points.

The HELOC is a risk to your home. When things go bad, sometimes they go very bad, and it can happen in a hurry.

Statistically, long-term disability is a real risk among us all-usually related to an accident. Do you want the roof over your head-to be at risk?

So, I would be sure I have an emergency fund, but would then pay the HELOC off as fast as possible.

Rates are going to climb this year-take full advantage of the low rates and get rid of the HELOC!

answered Feb 22 at 18:01

Dr%20Dean%201's gravatar image

Dr Dean 1
157417

I think the answer depends on when you think the interest rates will shoot up. If it's in the near future, keeping it in a savings account would be the smart move. If it won't happen for another year or two, you could "earn" 4.4% now by paying down the mortgage and more later by switching to the HELOC when the rates rise above 4.4%.

answered Feb 22 at 20:47

Daniel's gravatar image

Daniel
3958

1

Daniel, I know i must sound like an old fuddy duddy-maybe that's because I am. But this discussion reminds me of talking to my teen-when called out about driving 90 miles an hour down a narrow two lane road. "Nothing happened-so what's the big deal.

"Saving" 1 or 2 % on your heloc/mortgage/savings parameters (unless we are talking about a huge number), is not worth risking your home. This is not just "mathematics" and "theory". Crap happens every day. Ask all those folks facing foreclosure for having a mortgage, heloc and no equity.

But as they say, "Two sides, is what makes a market!"

(Feb 22 at 23:47) Dr Dean 1

I hear that. So are you advocating saving $20,000 (more? less?) and then making payments? What about when the variable is above 4.4%? Liquidate some of that savings and pay off the debt?

The reader doesn't say how much he has in savings. Let's assume he has a healthy emergency savings, because all he is asking about is which to pay off, not whether or not to pay it off in the first place.

The reader doesn't sound concerned about the losing the house at all.

(Feb 23 at 14:05) Daniel
1

Daniel, how much people save for their emergency fund? A lot of factors should go into that-the most common answer is 3-6 months of expenses. However, if you are in a high-risk industry for layoffs- more may be needed. If you are in a stable industry-less.

I think that as long as you make a thoughtful choice, you will be ahead of 95% of the country....

(Feb 23 at 14:55) Dr Dean 1

So assuming the reader has a healthy emergency fund, does it really make sense to put more in cash? Sure, he's only losing $200 on $10,000 each, but there's no reason to do that.

Why not pay down the mortgage now and save a few hundred dollars each year?

Your proposal sounds like he should always keep the cash and make one lump-sum payment at the end when he can pay off the rest of the house. After all, it would only cost him $200 a year!

The more I think about it, the more sense it makes to pay off the mortgage now until the rates start to rise, then HELOC when they get closer.

(Feb 23 at 16:26) Daniel

I totally agree with the Doctor on this one. After you factor in the possible risk of losing your home, the 1-2% difference "saved" in interest is nothing. For every $10,000 you do not pay down on the HELOC you are saving $200 a year, WHOPEE! I am not putting my most valuable asset at risk for that. I would pay off the HELOC ASAP and start building my emergency fund.

answered Feb 23 at 03:11

The%20Balanced%20Spreadsheet's gravatar image

The Balanced Spreadsheet
53017

Love the way you put that. Saving a few hundred dollars is nothing when you're talking about that amount of money. well put.

(Feb 23 at 14:00) Daniel
1

Thanks for the support, Balanced....

(Feb 23 at 14:52) Dr Dean 1
Your answer
toggle preview

powered by OSQA