|
I got this question from a reader and wanted your opinions: I have both a mortgage on our house, and a home equity line of credit. The mortgage rate is fixed (4.4.%) for 15 years. The home equity is variable, right now, it is only 2.24%. I am trying to accelerate payments beyond the minimum to get out of debt more quickly.
|
|
Your reader see a couple of the main issues already:
The reader's primary concern beyond this appears to be having enough funds available for big expenses. Let's take the mortgage out of the equation, since it's fixed, and likely will still be around when the big expenses hit. That leaves how to handle the HELOC. For this, there are a couple of ways to handle this:
These all will move toward the goal of having the big-expense funds available when they're needed. Some variables that could derail any of these, though:
If I were in your reader's shoes, I'd place priority on building up cash reserves to a comfortable level, then paying down the HELOC, then the mortgage. Cash in the bank buys time. The HELOC isn't as secure as money in the bank. For sure, this is a more costly way of doing it in the long run, since there's more interest paid on the HELOC, a low HELOC balance will do no good in the event of job loss, and the bank could well reduce the limit before then (or perhaps because of the job loss). I'd also encourage your reader to check out the terms of the HELOC to see whether my concerns are actually issues or not. I agree that right now he could be "earning" 4.4% by making payments on the mortgage, he could "earn" more by waiting and paying off the HELOC, which may reach 4.4% in the next year and could very well reach a much higher rate. By putting money into a savings account earning 1-2%, he would be losing 2-3% in the short term, but could gain it back in the long term. See my answer below
(Feb 22 at 20:47)
Daniel
|
|
MBH, as usual lays things out-very accurately. I would just add a few minor points. The HELOC is a risk to your home. When things go bad, sometimes they go very bad, and it can happen in a hurry. Statistically, long-term disability is a real risk among us all-usually related to an accident. Do you want the roof over your head-to be at risk? So, I would be sure I have an emergency fund, but would then pay the HELOC off as fast as possible. Rates are going to climb this year-take full advantage of the low rates and get rid of the HELOC! |
|
I think the answer depends on when you think the interest rates will shoot up. If it's in the near future, keeping it in a savings account would be the smart move. If it won't happen for another year or two, you could "earn" 4.4% now by paying down the mortgage and more later by switching to the HELOC when the rates rise above 4.4%. 1
Daniel, I know i must sound like an old fuddy duddy-maybe that's because I am. But this discussion reminds me of talking to my teen-when called out about driving 90 miles an hour down a narrow two lane road. "Nothing happened-so what's the big deal. "Saving" 1 or 2 % on your heloc/mortgage/savings parameters (unless we are talking about a huge number), is not worth risking your home. This is not just "mathematics" and "theory". Crap happens every day. Ask all those folks facing foreclosure for having a mortgage, heloc and no equity. But as they say, "Two sides, is what makes a market!"
(Feb 22 at 23:47)
Dr Dean 1
I hear that. So are you advocating saving $20,000 (more? less?) and then making payments? What about when the variable is above 4.4%? Liquidate some of that savings and pay off the debt? The reader doesn't say how much he has in savings. Let's assume he has a healthy emergency savings, because all he is asking about is which to pay off, not whether or not to pay it off in the first place. The reader doesn't sound concerned about the losing the house at all.
(Feb 23 at 14:05)
Daniel
1
Daniel, how much people save for their emergency fund? A lot of factors should go into that-the most common answer is 3-6 months of expenses. However, if you are in a high-risk industry for layoffs- more may be needed. If you are in a stable industry-less. I think that as long as you make a thoughtful choice, you will be ahead of 95% of the country....
(Feb 23 at 14:55)
Dr Dean 1
So assuming the reader has a healthy emergency fund, does it really make sense to put more in cash? Sure, he's only losing $200 on $10,000 each, but there's no reason to do that. Why not pay down the mortgage now and save a few hundred dollars each year? Your proposal sounds like he should always keep the cash and make one lump-sum payment at the end when he can pay off the rest of the house. After all, it would only cost him $200 a year! The more I think about it, the more sense it makes to pay off the mortgage now until the rates start to rise, then HELOC when they get closer.
(Feb 23 at 16:26)
Daniel
|
|
I totally agree with the Doctor on this one. After you factor in the possible risk of losing your home, the 1-2% difference "saved" in interest is nothing. For every $10,000 you do not pay down on the HELOC you are saving $200 a year, WHOPEE! I am not putting my most valuable asset at risk for that. I would pay off the HELOC ASAP and start building my emergency fund. Love the way you put that. Saving a few hundred dollars is nothing when you're talking about that amount of money. well put.
(Feb 23 at 14:00)
Daniel
|


Great question!