My DH is in the processing of wrestling out the details of our new mortgage/loan. Since he's up to his eyeballs in paperwork, can someone here explain why there's such a big difference in rates between a 15-year loan and a 30-year loan?
|
|
|||
|
|
|
MBH is exactly right. I just want to explain it a bit further. If the bank loans you $100,000 for 30 years at 5% interest, then interest rates in general go to 10% (heaven forbid), then they have tied up 100,000 bucks for thirty years earning half the interest rate they might be earning. So in general, when you get a loan, the longer the term, the higher the rate. When you LOAN banks money-(say CD's) it works the other way- the longer you let them have your money, the higher the rate they pay you. Although the "spread" on what they pay you on a cd, and what you pay them when you borrow is what is called their margin of profit (after their expenses and loan losses). That spread is now at record highs-so expect bank profits to soar over the next two years. If you have money to invest a good bank stock, or mutual fund invested in bank stocks, would be a good, (although speculative) investment right now..... This is not an endorsement to go buy any stock, and I am not a broker, and have very little bank stock right now.....It is just they have an earning machine going. Now the ones that have a ton of bad loans out, will have more trouble than the ones that didn't go crazy over the last 5 years with derivatives-but that is a whole 'nother story! |
||
|
|
|
|
Fifteen-year loans are almost always at a lower rate than 30-year loans. The rate difference has to do with risk to the lender. With a fixed-rate loan, there exists the possibility that the loan will go full-term. What this means for the lender is that the rate you lock in commits them for potentially 15 or 30 years. Since there's more time for rates to fluctuate in a 30-year loan, it commands a higher rate than a 15-year loan. |
||
|
|

